Workplace Privacy - It's a Hot Topic
"There are a couple of articles on the 2005 Workplace Privacy survey commissioned by the Society for Human Resource Management and CareerJournal.com(see:Survey Suggests Employees Doubt Workplace-Monitoring Motives and You May Have Less Privacy At Work Than You Think).
The articles highlight a number of areas of disconnect between employees and employers as relates to monitoring. For example:
- Nearly
90% of HR professionals believe that the company has a right to
"monitor Internet use" as compared to "about 60% of employees".
- Over 50% of HR professionals believe that it is okay to read employee e-mails as contrasted with 28% of employees.
- According to the HR professionals surveyed, the top reasons that they monitor employees are " protecting against computer viruses, keeping proprietary information from being compromised and maintaining workplace safety"
- Employees, on the other hand, "think their companies monitor employees to ensure productivity, to keep proprietary information safe, to monitor job performance, to track time spent on personal business, to protect itself from litigation and to see whether or not employees are job hunting"
According to the Information Week article: "Up
to 34% of employees believe the reason that employers engage in these
practices is because management doesn't trust them," Williams says.
"But we found that only 2% of companies [used monitoring] to determine
whether an employee was applying for a job elsewhere or because the
management doesn't trust employees."
There
are certainly numerous legal issues that must be considered when
"monitoring" employees. However, it is equally important to consider
and address the practical issues (i.e. on
employee morale, among others). Many of the legal and practical issues
can be dealt with and managed through careful planning and
communication with employee, including through the implementation of
appropriate policies."
It should be noted, that the resources in this post refer to US sources, and Canadians should exercise caution given the differences in the law. However, this posts and the articles emphasize some key difference in perceptions that are worthy of note.


Comments